Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
J Surg Educ ; 79(6): 1435-1440, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1983577

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Following the 2021 integrated plastic surgery match, we found a significant increase in home match rates and decrease in match rate for students without a home plastic surgery program with the elimination of visiting sub-internships and the initiation of virtual interviewing. With the return of visiting sub-internships in the 2022 match cycle, we hypothesize that these rates will approach values more consistent with historical controls. DESIGN: Program match data was obtained from posts to residency program Instagram pages and posts associated with the hashtag #PRSMatch2022. Data on visiting sub-internship matches was obtained from a publicly available Google Sheet with applicant contributors. The Chi square test was used to assess for differences. SETTING: Medical schools and plastic surgery programs were categorized into west, midwest, south, and northeast regions. PARTICIPANTS: Matched applicants to integrated plastic surgery residency programs. RESULTS: In total, 192 of 194 (99%) of applicants matched to integrated plastic surgery residency positions were identified. The match rate for applicants without an affiliated plastic surgery program (31.3%) increased from 2021 (p = 0.03) and returned to a level consistent with historical controls (p = 0.38). Similarly, the home program match rate (15.1%) and match rate for applicants from Top 40 medical schools (34.2%) decreased from 2021, returning to pre-pandemic levels (p = 0.63, p = 0.12). Finally, regional match preferences remained generally consistent with historical controls, apart from a higher proportion of northeast applicants matching to programs in the northeast (72.5%, p = 0.04), and a lower proportion of west applicants matching to programs in the west (26.3%, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The 2022 integrated plastic surgery match cycle saw a reversal of many of the changes to match rates seen in the 2021 cycle. These changes may be due to the reintroduction of visiting sub-internships following updates in COVID-19 policies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Inservice Training
2.
J Surg Educ ; 79(1): 249-252, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1294010

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Due to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic (COVID-19), guidelines regarding both elimination of visiting subinternships and substitution of virtual interviews for the 2021 match were adopted. We hypothesize that these changes will result in an increase in home institution match rates compared to previous years. DESIGN: Program match data was obtained using information posted to residency program Instagram pages and the hashtag #PRSMatch2021. Chi square was used to assess differences between groups. SETTING: Medical school regions were categorized as West, Midwest, South, and Northeast and compared to match program region. PARTICIPANTS: Matched candidates to integrated plastic surgery residencies RESULTS: A total of 181/187 (96.8%) integrated plastic surgery matched candidates were identified. Compared to historical controls, there was a statistically significant increase in the home match rate (24.3%, p = 0.004) and statistically significant decrease in match rate for students without a home plastic surgery program (21.0%, p = 0.004). Similar to prior years, applicants were more likely to match in their own region for all regions (p < 0.001); however, there was a statistical increase in students staying in the South region for residency compared to previous years (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: The 2021 match cycle resulted in an increase in home program match rates, while decreasing match rates among students without a home plastic surgery program. COVID-19 polices may have resulted in disadvantages to students from diverse institutional backgrounds. Influences of virtual subinternships and virtual interviews should be further evaluated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Surgery, Plastic , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Schools, Medical , Surgery, Plastic/education
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL